My concern is more with the school at which Avonte was a student. How could this have happened and how could it have been prevented? The special school that Avonte attended was part of another regular middle school. The school did not house just special education students. Avonte’s brother had met with a Manhattan civil rights attorney who specialized in special education litigation. Gary Mayerson, the attorney, outlined three layers of protection that should have been followed:
·
First is the IEP. Mayerson stated that a student who is non-verbal, as is Avonte,
and a student who is a known wanderer and who has been found in subway tunnels
in the past, should have had goals and objectives on his IEP to deal with that
issue. Instead Avonte was in a
classroom with one teacher, one aide and six students.
·
Avonte’s IEP should have had a behavior
intervention plan that would tell the teachers what to do if he began to wander.
·
There
should have been better security measures in place in the school that Avonte
attended. It is suggested that there
should have been specific protocols in place for when people/students left the
building and those reason for leaving needed to be stated.
Do
you think that the school administration was negligent in this case? What better security measures should the
school have implemented knowing that there were special education children within
in the building? Do you agree with the
attorney in this case and why?